Evaluation is the process of integrating and synthesizing summative assessment information from various sources and using the information to:

  • make inferences and judgments about how well the student has achieved the curriculum expectations; and
  • determine the worth and to place a value (a percentage or letter grade) on a student's achievement of the expectations in relation to the achievement chart provided in The Ontario Curriculum document for each subject.

To evaluate, teachers:

  • consider only summative assessment data when determining a report card grade.
  • ensure that the grade/mark incorporates the categories of knowledge and skills outlined in the achievement charts in the Ontario Curriculum.
  • consider the students' most consistent level of performance with special consideration for the more recent achievement information.

Analyzing and Interpreting the Data

Assessment serves a critical role in providing information for making instructional decisions as well as for evaluating and reporting student achievement. The data collected must regularly be analyzed and interpreted to determine:

  • the effectiveness of instruction/program in promoting student progress
  • students' strengths, needs, attitudes and interests
  • students' accomplishments
  • what additional assessment information may be required

Effective classroom assessment is based on the analysis and interpretation of a steadily growing body of evidence that is clearly related to purposes of instruction/program. This evidence:

  • is compiled using developmentally appropriate assessment methods and tools
  • reflects multiple and varied sources of data
  • is improvement-focused and expectations-based
  • reflects modifications made to accommodate students' cultural, racial and gender differences and disabilities
Arriving at the Grade

Where do I begin?
Look at the body of evidence you have collected.

What do I evaluate?
Data collected should include evidence of each of the four categories in the achievement charts found in the Ontario Curriculum. Knowledge/Understanding, Thinking/Inquiry, Communication and Application. During the term, student work is assessed analytically based on the criteria for each distinct task. For example, students may complete a test which assesses understanding of specific knowledge and/or content or they may give a presentation which is assessed on their ability to communicate information. For the purpose of the report card, you will examine the body of evidence in a holistic fashion.

Why levels to marks and not the other way around?
The report card is criterion referenced, based on the criteria outlined in the achievement chart. For the report card teachers are evaluating students' performance in a holistic fashion considering all four categories: knowledge/understanding, thinking/inquiry, communication and application. These broad categories of learning cannot be evaluated with a specific numeric value because of the range as described in the achievement charts. Not everything done in the classroom can be leveled. For example, spelling tests or multiplication facts cannot be leveled because there is only one correct answer. Activities where students can demonstrate a range of achievement lend themselves to being leveled.

Do I average the marks?
Given that teachers are providing students with specific feedback, it is expected that a student's achievement in each of the categories improves as the term progresses. If marks are averaged, students are penalized for their demonstration of achievement. Marks must be based on the highest, most consistent, most recent level of performance.

How do I arrive at a grade?
Determine which level best represents the students' work. Levels of achievement are based on performance of each of the four categories: Knowledge/Understanding, Thinking/Inquiry, Communication, and Application/Making Connections. Remember, look for solid and consistent patterns of performance. Below are some questions to consider for each category.

Knowledge/Understanding

  • How well does the student demonstrate knowledge and understanding of concepts and principles?
  • How well can the student transfer this understanding to situations that are new?
  • How well can the student demonstrate his or her understanding of the relationship between various concepts and principles?

Thinking/Inquiry

  • How well does the student demonstrate the ability to use creative and critical thinking to extend his or her knowledge and understanding?
  • How well can the student accurately analyze situations to reach logical conclusions?
  • How well can the student follow accepted processes for solving problems and arriving at possible solutions?

Communication

  • How well does the student demonstrate his or her ability to communicate orally, in writing, and graphically with others?
  • How well does the student communicate ideas and information to others?
  • How well does the student demonstrate proper use of language and terminology related to the specific course material?

Application/Making Connections

  • How well does the student demonstrate his or her ability to apply concepts and principles in both familiar and unfamiliar situations?
  • How well does the student make the connections between various concepts and principles in a variety of situations?
  • How well does the student demonstrate his or her ability to respond appropriately based on information and ideas from the course material?

Here is an example. You have determined that the body of evidence for a student falls into level 3. This takes into consideration the highest, most recent, consistent level of performance. In fact, some assessments show the student's work is beginning to show traits of level 4. The letter grade for a level 3 is B. Since there is some evidence of level 4, you may assign a B+ to show the student is beginning to move towards the next level.